A.BADHARUDEEN
Sreenarayana Vidhya Mandir Trust – Appellant
Versus
Unnikrishnan, S/o. Raman – Respondent
ORDER :
Two relevant questions arise herein are:
(2) What are the parameters governing grant of leave in a petition filed under Section 92(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure?
Respondents 1 and 2 in O.P (leave) No.23/2021 on the file of the Principal of the District Judge, Palakkad, have filed this Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging order passed by the learned District Judge under Section 92(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. Respondents herein are the original petitioners in the above scheme suit.
3. Heard Advocate Rajesh Sivaramankutty appearing for the petitioners, Advocate Sreehari, representing the 4th respondent and Advocate P.B.Krishnan appearing for other respondents.
4. Short facts: Petitioners filed O.P.No.23/2001 before the District Court, Palakkad under Section 92(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking leave to institute the Suit. Suit also filed along with the leave petition. The prayers in the Suit in relation to a public Trust include direction to the defendants by way of mandatory injunction to re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.