KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Arafath Aboobacker – Appellant
Versus
Arafeena Arafath – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ext.P5 order passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court II, Kannur (for short 'the court below') deciding the question of maintainability as a preliminary issue is under challenge in this Original Petition.
2. The petitioner is the husband. The 1st respondent is the wife. The 1st respondent filed Ext.P1 petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, (for short 'the DV Act') as M.C.No.132/2019 at the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court II, Kannur. The petitioner herein filed a petition C.M.P.No.1765/2021 to consider the question of maintainability as a preliminary issue. The petitioner has also filed Ext.P2 counter statement. In Ext.P2 counter statement, the petitioner challenged the maintainability of the petition on the ground that the court below lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the petition. The court below after hearing both sides dismissed the petition holding that it has territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the petition. Challenging the said order, the petitioner has approached this Court invoking Section 227 of the Constitution of India.
3. I have heard Sri.Rajesh Sukumaran.K, the learned counse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.