SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ker) 1149

T.R.RAVI
Philomina Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri P.K.Soyuz, Sri E.V.Babychan, Advs.
For the Respondent: Sri B.S.Syamanthak, Government Pleader

JUDGMENT :

The petitioner is the present owner of 23.30 Ares of land comprised in Sy.Nos.486/4 A1 and 486/4 B1 of Edathua Village. The properties are classified as 'Nilam' in the revenue records and in the Basic Tax Register (BTR). The properties were settled in favour of the petitioner by her husband as per settlement deed No.990/2006 dated 4.5.2006. The properties had devolved on the petitioner's husband as per gift deed No.2117/1957 dated 12.10.1957 executed by her husband's grandfather. The gift deed describes the property as a 'purayidam' as early as in 1957 and also shows that there is a building in the land.

2. The wrong entry in the BTR as 'Nilam' also continued in the notified data bank prepared by the Local Level Monitoring Committee of Edathua Grama Panchayat. According to the petitioner, the properties had been converted irreversibly even before 100 years. In order to correct the wrong entry, the petitioner submitted an application in Form No.5 before the 1st respondent on 2.3.2020. The application in Form No.9 was also submitted since lands had been converted before 1967. When action was not forthcoming, the petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.(C)No.3618/2021

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top