IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ALEXANDER THOMAS, VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ.
Sumesh V.S., Son Of V.K. Surendran – Appellant
Versus
Rajith T.A., Son of Arumughan P.V. – Respondent
OP(KAT) No. 36, 31 of 2022
Decided on : 05-05-2022
KS&SSR - Rule 12(9), 2(15), 8, 17(b), 26, 16, 24 – Airport Authority of India (General Conditions of Service and Remuneration of Employees) Regulation, 2003 - Members absent from duty - Membership of more than one service - Whether petitioner who has left service of Forest Department for taking appointment in Airport Authority of India retains his lien in Forest department so as to make him eligible for by-transfer appointment as Range Forest Officer - It is very well settled that when a person with a lien against post is appointed substantively to another post, only then he acquires a lien against latter post.
Findings of Court :
Court have no hesitation to hold that petitioner is not entitled to participate in selection process for by-transfer appointment as Range Forest Officer in Forest Department inasmuch as petitioner on being appointed in Airport Authority of India and being confirmed in said post cannot retain his lien in parent department, i.e., Forest Department - Court find no reason to interfere with well considered order passed by Kerala Administrative Tribunal in O.A.
Result : Petitions dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Viju Abraham, J.
O.P.(KAT) No.31 of 2022 is filed by the 5th respondent in O.A.(EKM) No.776 of 2021 and O.P.(KAT) No.36 of 2022 is filed by the applicant in O.A.(EKM) No.1472 of 2021 (5th respondent in O.A. (EKM) No.776 of 2021) before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram, Ernakulam Bench aggrieved by the common order dated 23.09.2021, disposing of both the Original Applications, whereby O.A.(EKM) No.776 of 2021 was allowed and O.A.(EKM) No.1472 of 2021 was dismissed. Since the issue involved in both these original petitions is the same, they are heard and disposed of together.
2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of the above Original Petitions are as follows:
3. Respondents 1 to 3 are the applicants in O.A.(EKM) No.776 of 2021 who are employees included as rank Nos.39, 40 and 44 respectively in the ranked list for by-transfer appointment to a post of Range Forest Officer in category No.213/2016. The grievance raised by the said applicants in the O.A. was regarding the issuance of a lien certificate in favour of the 5th respondent, the petitioner herein, even though he has been confirmed in service in the Airport Authority of India and consequential inclusion of the 5th respondent in the ranked list by accepting the said lien certificate, by the 2nd respondent Public Service Commission. Annexure-A1 is the notification dated 03.08.2016 issued by the 2nd respondent for selection to the post of Range Forest Officers earmarked for recruitment by transfer from Forest Officers. In fact, the 5th respondent was relieved as per Annexure-A2 order dated 30.05.2017 to join the Airport Authority of India. The 5th respondent in the Original Application approached the Tribunal earlier by filing O.A.(EKM) No.1886 of 2020 praying for issuance of a lien certificate. The Tribunal as per Annexure-A3 interim order dated 12.01.2021 directed the Divisional Forest Officer, Kodanadu to issue certificate regarding his lien in the post of Beat Forest Officer within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and further directed that on the production of the said certificate, the Public Service Commission shall consider the same for the purpose of inclusion of the 5th respondent in the ranked list to be prepared in pursuance to Annexure-A1 notification. Annexure-A4 is the ranked list published on 28.01.2021 by the 2nd respondent Public Service Commission wherein the applicants were included as rank Nos.39, 40 and 44 respectively. It is averred that by Annexure-A5 order dated 09.02.2021 in a similar matter, O.A.(EKM) No.290 of 2021, the Tribunal issued an interim order directing that since the earlier order passed by the Tribunal for issuance of a lien certificate has not been complied with, the earlier order passed as per Annexure-A7 therein should be strictly complied with. In O.A. (EKM) No.1886 of 2020 filed by the 5th respondent, Annexure-A6 dated 24.02.2021 was issued wherein the Divisional Forest Officer, Kodanadu was directed to ensure that a proper lien certificate as per the directions in Annexure-A3 order may be issued. Consequently, Annexure-A7 lien certificate dated 03.03.2021 was issued in favour of the 5th respondent/petitioner herein. A further interim order dated 05.03.2021 was issued in O.A.(EKM) No.1886 of 2020 as Annexure-A8, wherein a direction was issued to the Public Service Commission to take a decision on accepting the lien certificate and initiate action for inclusion of the 5th respondent/petitioner herein in Annexure-A6 ranked list by issuing an addendum notification. While so, the 3rd applicant in the present O.A. filed an application for getting himself impleaded. Though the same was allowed, O.A. (EKM) No.1886 of 2020 was closed as per the order dated 25.03.2021 recording the submission of the Kerala Public Service Commission that a decision has been taken to accept the lien certificate issued in favour of the 5th respondent and expeditious steps are being taken to incl
Balakrishnan Nair v. Ram Mohan Nair [1998(1) KLT 766]
Radhakrishnan Nair v. Secretary to Government [2014 (3) KLT 433]
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.