P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
Dhanya C – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Rep. by Secretary, Local Self Government Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The main point to be decided in these writ petitions is whether a licence is necessary as per the Kerala Places of Public Resort Act, 1963 (for short, Act 1963) for starting and functioning a gymnasium. It is conceded by both sides in these cases that several gymnasiums are working in our state without getting licence as per the Act 1963. Gymnasium have become a holy places like temples, mosques, churches etc for the young and the older people alike in the current world. Going to the gym is taken as a credit by men and women of all age groups. That is a good signal for achieving a healthy world. But the atmosphere in a Gymnasium should be attractive, and it should function legally after obtaining all the statutory licences.
2. The above two writ petitions are connected and therefore I am disposing these writ petitions by a common judgment. I will narrate the facts in W.P.(C). No.22937 of 2021. The petitioners are aggrieved by the functioning of a fitness centre with the name and style 'High Power Multi Gym and Fitness Centre' without obtaining a licence from the 4th respondent Neyyattinkara Municipality. According to the petitioners, the gym has been functioning without li
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.