IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P.CHALY, JJ.
Raphy John, S/o. P.P. John – Appellant
Versus
Land Revenue Commissioner, Thiruvananthapuram – Respondent
W.P.(C) Nos. 11249 of 2010, 26458 of 2014, 35030 of 2016, 335, 17010 of 2017, 12389 of 2018, 8244 of 2019, 8913 of 2019, 10754 of 2019, 34020 of 2019, 3012 of 2020, 4070 of 2020, 11627 of 2020, 17240 of 2020, 8203, 16223, 16880, 18523, 25475, 25917, 29510, 30550 of 2021, and W.A. Nos. 1434 of 2017, 477, 478, 480, 663, 712, 713, 714 of 2018, 1453 of 2019, 1397, 1145 of 2020 & 8 of 2022]
Decided on : 25-05-2022
Assignment of Government Lands for Rubber Cultivation, 1960 – Kerala Land Assignment Rules, 1964 – Rules, 2005 – Kerala Government Land Assignment Act, 1960 – Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation), Act, 1957 – Section 2, 3(c), 4, 15, 15(1A)(e), – Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 – Rule 4, 27 – Kerala Land Assignment Act, 1960 – Assignment of Government Land for Rubber Cultivation, 1960 – Forest Conservation Act, 1980 – Arable Forest Land Assignment Rules, 1970 – Transfer of Property Act – Kerala Government Land Assignment Act, 1960 – Section 3 – Held, Writ petitions and intra court appeals are materially connected in regard to grant of, or application submitted for quarrying lease, by or before State Government; stop memos issued thereunder by the revenue authorities; rejection of applications for quarrying etc., in lands specially assigned for cultivation, or house sites or beneficial enjoyment of adjoining lands or for other specific and special purpose – Held, Going through provisions of the Rules, 1964 and other special rules, court are of clear opinion that Tahsildar is vested with powers to cancel Orders of Assignment/Patta, if rules and conditions in the Order of Assignment/Patta are violated, and therefore, there is no force in the argument advanced by learned counsel for writ petitioners/appellants that Tahsildar/District Collector concerned has no power to issue stop memos, directing to stop quarrying as per lease granted under the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 or erstwhile Rules, 1967 – When power to issue assignment is conferred on Tahsildar, as per rules, and Orders of Assignment/Patta are issued Tahsildar, he is definitely vested with powers to cancel same and resume land – Court cannot be unmindful of duty cast upon State under Part IV of Constitution of India dealing with Directive Principles of State Policy, and particularly, Article 48A, specifying about protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wildlife, and fundamental duty to protect and improve natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife and to safeguard public property, under Part IVA – W.P. dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
SHAJI P. CHALY
The captioned writ petitions and intra court appeals are materially connected in regard to the grant of, or application submitted for quarrying lease, by or before the State Government; the stop memos issued thereunder by the revenue authorities; the rejection of applications for quarrying etc., in the lands specially assigned for cultivation, or house sites or beneficial enjoyment of adjoining lands or for other specific and special purposes, under the Kerala Government Land Assignment Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to, as 'the Act, 1960'), and the rules framed thereunder; such as the Kerala Land Assignment Rules, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules, 1964'), the Special Rules for Assignment of Government Lands for Rubber Cultivation, 1960, and the Arable Forest Land Assignment Rules, 1970.
2. Most of the writ petitions before us, are consequent to the reference orders passed by learned single Judges dated 12.07.2019 & 15.02.2022, the reason for which would be specified later. Some are public interest litigation against the quarrying operations conducted in the assigned lands.
3. In all the cases filed by the quarry operators, they are the purchasers of lands from primary assignees, which is undisputed. In fact, the Rules of Assignment under the Rules specified above, relating to reservation of rights of the Government, and to mine and quarries, subjacent to the assigned lands, are materially one and the same. In the rules, State Government have reserved its share to mines and quarries, subjacent to the land in its favour; which thus means, the assignment was made by the Government to primary assignees, to use the topsoil of the assigned land for cultivation or house construction or for beneficial enjoyment of adjoining lands. The rules in regard to the same; the clauses contained in Appendix I and II of Rule 9 of the Rules, 1964; and the other Rules specified above, will be discussed later.
4. In fact, the purchasers of the lands assigned under the rules specified above, claim that they are entitled to conduct quarrying operations, in accordance with the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015, formulated by the State Government, by virtue of the powers conferred under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation), Act, 1957, a Central enactment. Section 15(1A)(e) of the Act, 1957 deals with the procedure for obtaining quarry leases, mining leases or other mineral concessions.
5. Section 3(c) of the Act, 1957 defines mining lease as a lease granted for the purpose of undertaking mining operations, and includes a sub-lease granted for such purpose.
6. Rule 4 of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 deals with the application for quarrying permit. Section 4(2)(c) of the Rules, 2015 provides for a certificate from the Village Officer concerned to the effect that the land in respect of which quarrying permit is applied for, is not assigned for any special purpose by the department of Land Revenue. Rule 27 of the Rules, 2015 deals with an application for grant or renewal of a quarrying lease, which shall be made to the competent authority in Form 'B’, and among other conditions, it insists for a certificate from the Village Officer concerned to the effect that the land applied for quarrying lease, is not assigned for any special purpose by the department of Land Revenue.
7. In fact, in some of the cases, based on the application submitted by the purchasers of the lands assigned, quarrying leases/permits were granted by the authorities concerned, on the basis of Non Assignment Certificate issued by the Village Officer concerned.
8. The case projected by the State Government is that the writ petitioners/quarry operators have secured quarrying lease, without properly disclosing the nature of assignment granted by the concerned authority to the primary assignees, at the time of submission of the applications. Admittedly, after obtaining necessary permit/licence, on the basis
All Kerala River Protection Council v. State of Kerala (2015 (2) KLT 78 (D.B.)
Bhawanji Lakhamshi and Ors. v. Himatlal Jamnadas Dani and Ors. (AIR 1972 SC 819)
Baijnath Kedia v. State of Bihar and Ors. [(1969) 3 SCC 838]
C. Albert Morris v. K. Chandrasekaran and Ors. [(2006) 1 SCC 228]
Deepak Kumar & Ors. v. State of Haryana (2012 (1) KLT Suppl. 60 (SC) : (2012) 4 SCC 629)
Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. v. Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy and Ors. [AIR 1995 AP 1]
Haridas v. State of Kerala and others reported in 2016 (4) KLT 707
Haridas R. v. State of Kerala and Others [2016 (5) KHC 615]
Karimbil Kunhikannan v. State of Kerala
Mahindra Holidays & Resorts India Limited v. State of Kerala [2019 (2) KLT 978]
M.C. Chockalingam and Ors. v. V. Manickavasagam and Ors. (AIR 1974 SC 104)
Nature Lovers Movement v. State of Kerala and Ors. [AIR 2000 Ker 131]
One Earth One Life v. Ministry of Environment and Forests [2018 (3) KLT 683]
Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Land Revenue [2007 (2) KLT 850]
Raja Anand Brahma Shah v. State of U.P.
State of A.P. v. Balarami Reddy
State of Haryana v. Chaman Lal
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Duvvuru Balarami Reddy (AIR 1963 SC 264)
Sashi Bhusan Misra v. Jyoti Prasad Singh
Shibu v. Tahsildar reported in [1993 (2) KLT 870]
Sri Tarkeshwar Sio Thakur Jiu v. Dar Dass Dey & Co. and Ors.
Varkey Abraham v. Secretary to Government [2007 (3) KLT 702]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.