SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ker) 1170

KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
CHANDRAN S/O KARUPPU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P.V. ANOOP.
For the Respondent: SANAL P. RAJ.

ORDER :

1. These criminal revision petitions are directed against the judgment dated 18th March, 2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Court, (Adhoc-II), Kozhikode (for short “the appellate court”) in Crl. Appeal No. 165/2004 confirming the judgment dated 16th February, 2004 passed by the Assistant Sessions Court, Vatakara (for short “the trial court”) in S.C. No. 426/2001.

2. The revision petitioners/accused Nos. 1 and 2 faced trial for the offence punishable u/s 55(a) of the Abkari Act and Rule 9 of the Foreign Liquor Rules.

3. The prosecution case in short is that on 2.2.1998 at 5.45 p.m. the accused were found transporting 40 bottles of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) each containing 180 of ml liquor in an autorickshaw bearing Regn. No. KL-11D 7594 at Rayarangoth from Mahe to Kerala without any valid documents and in contravention of the Abkari Act and the Rules.

4. On receipt of the summons, both accused appeared at the trial court. After hearing both sides, charge was framed against the accused u/s 55(a) of the Abkari Act and Rule 9 of the Foreign Liquor Rules. The charge was read over and explained to the accused who pleaded not guilty.

5. The prosecution examined PWs. 1 to 7

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top