SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 565

Daniel – Appellant
Versus
M. G. George – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

VARGHESE KALLIATH, J.

This revision petition is under Section 20 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Three tenants occupying three rooms of a building are the revision petitioners. Landlord filed petition for eviction under Sections 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act. Now we are concerned only with the ground under Section 11(3) of the Act. Landlord claimed eviction for bonafide need for own occupation on the basis that he has constructed a multi-storeyed building just behind the building occupied by the tenants. The building constructed is in the city of Thiruvananthapuram and it is in an important locality. The multi-storeyed building was constructed after obtaining the due permission and licence from the Corporation on condition that the landlord will provide sufficient space for car parking for the multi-storeyed building. Landlord submitted that only if the building occupied by the tenants is demolished and that space is also used for the purpose of car parking, the conditions stipulated for giving the licence can be fulfilled.

2. The Rent Control Court after a thorough investigation of at the circumstances and the ev

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top