SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 30

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Shaji P. Chaly, J.
Kerala Public Service Commission Represented By Its Secretary, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram – Petitioner
Versus
The State Commissionerate For Persons With Disabilities, Social Welfare Institution Complex, Poojappura, Thiruvananthapuram, Represented By Its Secretary, Anr. – Respondents
WP(C) No. 35154 Of 2017
Decided On : 11-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. P.C. Sasidharan.

Point of Law: Powers of the Commissioner are confined to what is conferred under Section 80.

Headnote:

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Right of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Section 82 - Kerala Public Service Commission - Petition filed by KPSC to declare that the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities has no power or authority to issue an order – Whether petition is maintainable – If the Commissioner wanted to consider the grievances highlighted in the representation submitted by the second respondent, it ought to have made a recommendation to the KPSC as empowered under Section 80 of the Act, 2016. Therefore, it is clear that the Commissioner has over reached the powers conferred on it under the Act, 2016. ( Para 7, 8)

Finding of the Court:

Commissioner, is not a civil court, even though powers are conferred on the Commissioner to exercise the powers conferred on the civil court for summoning and enforcing the attendance of witnesses etc., and for other consequential aspects, in accordance with Section 82 of the Act, 2016 -On a perusal of Section 80, it is clear that the Commissioner under the Act, 2016 is not vested with any such powers – Court is of the considered opinion that order suffers from vice of arbitrariness and illegality, liable to be interfered with under Article 226 of the Constitution of India –

Result: Ordered accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition is filed by the Kerala Public Service Commission (for short, the 'KPSC') to declare that the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities has no power or authority to issue an order in the nature of Ext.P1 dated 05.08.2017 and further to declare that Ext.P1 order is issued beyond the powers and jurisdiction vested with the first respondent as per the Right of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (for short, the 'Act, 2016').

2. Brief material facts for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows:-

The second respondent namely, one Anseer N.A., apparently a person differently-abled, has submitted an application seeking to have an examination center near the house of differently-abled persons before the local MLA, who has forwarded it to the State Government and the State Government has delivered the same to the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities. The State Commissioner as per Ext.P1 has issued a direction to the KPSC that candidates with disabilities, who are participating in the selection process of the KPSC shall be provided with examination centres near their residences. It is further specified in the order that the said order is issued by virtue of the power conferred on the Commissioner as a civil court. It is thus challenging the legality and correctness of Ext.P1, this writ petition is filed.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri P.C. Sasidharan, and learned Senior Government Pleader, Sri Joby Joseph, and perused the pleadings and material on record. Even though notice is served on the party respondent, there is no appearance.

4. Section 82 of the Act, 2016 deals with powers of State Commissioner, which reads thus:-

    “82. Powers of State Commissioner.—(1) The State Commissioner shall, for the purpose of discharging their functions under this Act, have the same powers of a Civil Court as are vested in a Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters, namely:—

(a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of witnesses;

(b) requiring the discovery and production of any documents;

(c) requisitioning any public record or copy thereof from any court or office;

(d) receiving evidence on affidavits; and

(e) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents.

(2) Every proceeding before the State Commissioner shall be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) and the State Commissioners shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purposes of section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974).”

5. Merely because a power is conferred on the State Commissioner to follow the procedure contained under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 while trying a suit in respect to summoning and enforcing the attendance of witnesses; requiring production of documents and others, that does not mean that the Commissioner is exercising the substantive powers under the Act, 2016, as if, it is a civil court.

6. Section 80 of the Act, 2016 deals with the functions of the State Commissioner, which reads as follows:-

    “80. Functions of State Commissioner.—The State Commissioner shall—

(a) identify, suo motu or otherwise, provision of any law or policy, programme and procedures, which are inconsistent with this Act, and recommend necessary corrective steps;

(b) inquire, suo motu or otherwise deprivation of rights of persons with disabilities and safeguards available to them in respect of matters for which the State Government is the appropriate Government and take up the matter with appropriate authorities for corrective action;

(c) review the safeguards provided by or under this Act or any other law for the time being in force for the protection of rights of persons with disabilities and recommend measures for their effective implementation;

(d) review the factors that inhibit the enjoyment of rights of persons with disabi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top