IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J.
Elon Christ Stephen - Petitioner
Versus
Steaphen Antony Venasious, S/o. Johny Nicolas Venasious - Respondent
RPFC No. 400 of 2023
Decided On : 27-10-2023
Fact of the Case:
The revision petitioner filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for maintenance. The Family Court dismissed the application for default.Finding of the Court:
The court held that the dismissal of the application for default was erroneous as there is no implicit power to dismiss such applications under Chapter IX. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was restored to file for further consideration.Issues:
Can an application filed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure be dismissed for default?Ratio Decidendi:
The court analyzed the provisions of Section 125 and Section 126 of the Code and concluded that there is no implicit power to dismiss an application for default under Chapter IX. It emphasized that the purpose of Chapter IX is to prevent vagrancy and compel a person to maintain his family members who are unable to support themselves.Final Decision:
The impugned order was set aside, and the Family Court was directed to dispose of the application on its merits and in accordance with law.ORDER :
Can an application filed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure be dismissed for default?
2. The revision petitioner, through his mother, had filed M.C.No.68/2022 before the Family Court, Pala, against his father ? the respondent ? under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (‘Code’ for short) for an order of maintenance. The revision petitioner has averred in the application that he was born on 1.4.2023 in the wedlock between the respondent and his mother. Due to the cruelty meted out to his mother by his father, his mother was compelled to leave the matrimonial home in her advanced stage of pregnancy with the revision petitioner. The respondent has willfully refused to maintain the revision petitioner since his birth. Hence, the revision petitioner was constrained to file the application for maintenance.
3. Along with the application, the revision petitioner had filed a miscellaneous application for interim maintenance. The Family Court allowed the miscellaneous application and ordered the respondent to pay the revision petitioner interim maintenance @ Rs.12,000/-per month. Yet, the respondent refused to pay maintenance, and the revision petitioner filed an application to execute the order. On 1.7.2023, when the application came up for consideration, the Family Court, by the impugned order, dismissed the application on the ground that there was no representation for the revision petitioner.
4. It is assailing the legality and propriety of the order; the revision petition is filed.
5. Heard; Smt. Anitha Mathai, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner. Even though notice was served on the respondent, there is no appearance for him.
6. The revision petitioner is the minor son of the respondent. The revision petitioner has alleged that his father has refused to maintain him. The records reveal that the Family Court had directed the respondent to pay the revision petitioner interim maintenance. Still, he refused to comply with the order, and the revision petitioner had filed an application to execute the interim order. It was at that stage that the Family Court dismissed the application for default.
7. Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, encompassing Sections 125 to 128, deals with orders for the maintenance of wives, children and parents. The Chapter is a Code in itself in the Code of Criminal Procedure, which defines a minor, a wife, the persons who are entitled and liable to pay maintenance, the grounds which entitle and disentitle a person from claiming maintenance, the procedure to deal with applications filed under the Chapter, alteration and the enforcement of orders passed under the Chapter etc.
8. The concept of “maintenance” covered by Chapter IX of the Code is deeply rooted in the principles of social justice to prevent the destitution of women and children, who fall within the constitutional sweep of Article 15 (3) and reinforced by Articles 21 and 39 of the Constitution of India. The Chapter aims to prevent the vagrancy of women and children, who are deserted into destitution, and to ensure their dignity is upheld in society.
9. In an illuminating judgment, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Bhuwan Mohan Singh v. Meena [(2015) 6 SCC 353] observed as under :
“2. Be it ingeminated that Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "the Code") was conceived to ameliorate the agony, anguish, financial suffering of a woman who left her matrimonial home for the reasons provided in the provision so that some suitable arrangements can be made by the court and she can sustain herself and also her children if they are with her. The concept of sustenance does not necessarily mean to lead the life of an animal, feel like an unperson to be thrown away from grace and roam for her basic maintenance somewhere else. She is entitled in law to lead a life in the similar manner as she would have lived in the house of her husband. That is where the status and strata come into play, and
AI
An application for maintenance filed under Chapter IX cannot be dismissed for default as there is no implicit power granted to do so under the relevant provisions.
Section 125 Cr.P.C. establishes a continuing liability to pay maintenance and provides for its enforcement through Section 125(3). The provision serves a social purpose to prevent destitution and pro....
The court upheld that maintenance cases should not be dismissed for default when the petitioner is unable to appear due to circumstances beyond their control, reinforcing a parent's responsibility to....
The main legal point established is that an order for maintenance under Section 125 of the Code remains operative until vacated or altered in accordance with the provisions of the Code.
The court emphasized the summary nature of the proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the objective to provide immediate relief to the applicant.
The court established that enforcement of maintenance orders under Section 125 Cr.P.C. must be pursued through Section 128 Cr.P.C., as the latter provides the appropriate legal framework for such enf....
Maintenance proceeding – Speedy trial/enquiry is fundamental rights of parties – Principle of natural justice shall be followed while adjudicating petition.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the purpose of section 125 of Cr.P.C. is to prevent vagrancy and destitution, and it is a measure of social justice to protect women and child....
The court established that the provisions of Sections 125, 126, and 127 Cr.P.C. allow for the recall and modification of maintenance orders, and that Section 362 Cr.P.C. does not impose a bar on such....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.