P. M. MANOJ, RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V.
Benjeena P. J. – Appellant
Versus
C. P. Pappachan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This petition is filed challenging the order dated 09.11.2023 in I.A. No. 2 of 2023 in O.P. No. 578 of 2023 on the files of the Family Court, North Paravur, by which the application filed by the respondent for amendment of the written statement was allowed.
2. Short facts are as under. For the sake of ease and clarity, the parties shall be described as per their status before the Family Court:
(b) The respondent filed a written statement on 18.12.2019 contending inter alia that the marriage solemnized between the parties was neither legal nor in accordance with the Cochin Christian Civil Marriage Act, 1095 and in that view of the matter, no declaration, as prayed for, can be granted.
(c) While so, the respondent filed an application to amend Ext.P2 written statement.
(d) A detailed counter statement was filed pointing out that the amendment sought, if allowed, will change the entire nature of the case and the attempt of the respondent was to resile from his earlier version and put up new content
Akshaya Restaurant vs. P. Anjanappa
B.K. Narayana Pillai vs. Parameswaran Pillai
Baldev Singh and Others vs. Manohar Singh
B.K. Narayana Pillai vs. Parameshwaram Pillai and Another
Heeralal vs. Kalyan and Others
Ma Shwe Mya vs. Maung Mo Hnaung
Modi Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. and Another vs. Ladha Ram and Co. (1976) 4 SCC 320
Revajeetu Builders and Developers vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and Others
Usha Balashabeb Swami and Others vs. Kiran Appaso Swami and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.