MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
Joseph Kavirayor Ethelbert – Appellant
Versus
NSK Umesh – Respondent
ORDER
The Contempt of Court Case has been filed alleging non compliance of the directions in the judgment of this Court dated 12.02.2024 in W.P.(C) No.5306 of 2024. The Registry, on scrutiny, has noted a defect that grounds as stipulated under Rule 5A of the Contempt of Court Rules are not filed.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has answered the defect stating that ‘the grounds are included in the statement of facts’.
3. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is posted today ‘as filing defect’.
4. In the Contempt of Court petition filed, no separate ‘grounds’ are set out. After setting forth the ‘statement of facts’, it is stated that ‘the grounds are included in the statement of facts’. The point to be considered is whether the Contempt of Court Case petition shall contain the grounds on which the relief is sought.
5. Heard Sri. Abraham George Jacob, the learned counsel for the petitioner.
6. Rule 5A of the Contempt of Courts (High Court of Kerala) Rules, 1988 reads as follows:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.