SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 1053

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


ORDER :

1. This revision petition has been filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to 'Cr.P.C.' for short).

2. The revision petitioner is the second accused in C.C.No.72/07 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Attingal and he impugns judgment in the above case as well as judgment in Crl.A.No.254/2012 dated 03.03.2016 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court-VII, Thiruvananthapuram.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the records.

4. I shall refer the parties in this revision petition as 'prosecution' and 'accused' for convenience.

5. The prosecution case is that at about 10.15 am on 17.09.2006, the second accused, who was a pillion rider on a Hero Honda Splendor motor cycle bearing registration No.KL-01-T-5984 ridden by the first accused, while travelling from Kilimanoor – Karette, snatched away a gold chain worn by the first witness, who was waiting for bus at Erattachira. The specific case is that the second accused got out from the bike and snatched away the gold chain, weighing 55.825 gm having value of Rs.55,000/-. On this occurrence,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top