K.N.SHUKLA
Sadassiva Rauji Gaitonde – Appellant
Versus
Jose Joaquim Fonseca – Respondent
2. The dispute refers to a property named "Xir" or "Molloi" Vinanechem Bata together with a residential house standing thereon.
3. Plaintiffs claimed title to the suit property by virtue of a sale deed dated 16-6-1960 executed by one Rajaram Vaglo. Earlier, plaintiffs had brought a suit under Art. 1043 of the Portuguese Civil P. C. r/w Section 953 of the Port. Civil Code for summary eviction of these defendants i. e. Sadashiva (Since deceased) and his wife. The suit was decreed by the trial Court but in appeal the decree was set aside by the Court of the Judicial Commissioner on the ground that the property was in possession of defendant Sadashiva for a period exceeding one year before the filing of the suit and no relief by way of summary eviction under Art.1043 of Port. Civil P. C. (which is analogous to Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963) could be granted. Plaintiffs therefore were obliged to file a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession.
4. Plaintiffs case, shortly stated was as follows :- On 17-6-1960 plaintiff No. 2 Smt. Apolonia purchased the suit property from one Rajaram Vaglo for a consideration of Rs. 5,000/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.