C.M.RAO
Govind Babaji Naik Araundekar – Appellant
Versus
Shankar Babu Naik Araundekar – Respondent
2. The only point on which the learned advocate for the revision petitioner argued is that the lower court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit as the revision petitioner had contended that he was in possession of the suit land as tenant and as per Tenancy Act civil courts cannot decide the question of tenancy. Decisions in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.