SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Goa) 32

R.S.BINDRA
Phiroz Jehangirji Dastur – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
G.A. Merchant, for Petitioner; S. Tamba, Govt. Pleader, for the State.

ORDER : The facts bearing on this revision petition can be gathered from the complaint filed by Phiroz Jehangirji Dastur against the accused Roshan Jal Nanavaty, Homi Dhunjibhoy Engineer and Mohamedali Alibhai Damania in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate at Daman under Sections 120B, 403, 448, 341, 454 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused No. 2, Homi Dhunjibhoy Engineer, it is said, is a member of the bar and happens to be the attorney of accused no. 1 Roshan Jal Nanavaty. Accused No. 1 owns at Daman a property known as Roshan Abad and she used to run hotel business therein in the name and style of Brighton Hotel. On 30th of April 1953, runs the complaint, the accused No. 1 executed a lease agreement in favour of the complainant respecting the aforementioned Brighton Hotel. The complainant was put into possession of the demised property on 10th of June 1953. On 4-9-1953 accused Nos. 1 and 2 approached Mr. Mehta, a solicitor of the complainant, requesting him to prevail upon the complainant to surrender possession of the Brighton Hotel to them. The complainant when summoned refused to oblige the accused. The said two accused put more pressure on the complainant through t











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top