SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Goa) 33

V.S.JETLEY
Ibrahim Husen – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S. Marathe, for Applicant-Petitioner; S. Tamba, Government Pleader, for Respondent.

ORDER : This revision petition under Ss. 435 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Panjim, dated 19th April 1968. The learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal of the appellant against his conviction under S. 379 read with S. 75 of the Penal Code. The sentence awarded was R. I. for 2 years and a fine of Rs. 1000 or, in default, 6 months' further R. I.

2. The appellant and one Babu Loximona Naik were charged together for an offence under S. 379 read with S. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The material part of the charge was that on the night between 15th and 16th November 1967 between 7-30 p.m. and 5-00 a.m. they stole one dynamo, one pressure-jack and one spanner from truck No. 6472 in possession of the complainant, the value of the stolen parts being about Rs. 1200. Babu Loximona Naik pleaded guilty to the charge and, consequently, he was sentenced to undergo R. I. for 4 months and a fine of Rs. 100 or, in default, to undergo one month's further R. I. Babu Loximona Naik thereafter was examined as a witness in a trial against the appellant. In addition, the prosecution examined the complainant and some other witnesse






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top