R.S.BINDRA
Ashok Auto Service of Betim – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
2. The facts of the case are not in dispute and they fall within a short compass. On 11-7-1966 the petitioner addressed an application to the Director, Regional Transport Office, Bombay, for a permit for operating buses on Betim-Bombay route and return. A copy of this application was sent to the Director, Regional Transport Office, Panjim, with the covering letter of the same date in which the Director was requested to forward to the Director at Bombay the copy of the aforementioned letter with favourable comments. The Director at Panjim informed the petitioner that the latter better apply for the route permit when applications for the purpose will be called, while the Director at Bombay apprised the petitioner by letter dated 4-10-1966 that since the route in question was inter-state route it was necessary for the petitioner to obtain the reco
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.