V.S.JETLEY
Parxurama Ladu Ussopcar – Appellant
Versus
Jaia and State – Respondent
2. The plaintiff-appellants (Parxurama Ladu Ussopcar and his wife) filed a suit for declaration of the right to indemnity against defendant-respondents (Shrimati Jaia and others) on account of occupation of a portion of the plot used as a tea shop by the defendant-respondents. A decree was passed in favour of the plaintiff-appellants. The plaintiff-appellants thereafter moved the learned Sub-Judge for claiming Rs. 8,560 as annual indemnity amount for the period 19th July, 1935, to 19th November, 1964, at the rate of Rs. 360 per annum. The Escrivao, in his office note, submitted that the plaintiff-appellants should pay Court fees on this amount under the relevant provisions of the Court Fees Act. The plaintiff-appellants felt that since they were executing the decree therefore court fee is not payable under the Court Fees Act. It was further stated on their behalf that as the original suit filed was under the Portuguese Civil Procedure Code therefore the law in force when the suit was f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.