SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 775

N.K.JAIN
Jamil Jahur Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Presence in Appeal No. 45 of 2003 & 177 of 2003 Mr. N.A. Naqvi with Mr. C.P. Meena, for the Appellant Jamil, Ramzan and Kallu, Smt. Nirmala Sharma, P.P., for the State.
Presence in Appeal No. 43 of 2003 Mr. R.K. Mathur, for the Appellant Siddiq Smt. Nirmala Sharma, P.P., for the State.
Presence in Appeal No. 44 of 2003 Mr. Praveen Balwada with Mr. Hukam Chand Sharma and Mr. Suresh Dhanwal and Mr. O.P. Jhajharia, for the Appellant Netram. Smt. Nirmala Sharma, P.P., for the State.
Presence in Appeal No. 1703 of 2002 Mr. Virendra Singh Yadav, for tje Appellants-Rajendra and Avinash, Smt. Nirmala Sharma, P.P., for the State.

Judgment

Narendra Kumar Jain, J.-These five appeals, on behalf of seven accused-persons, namely, (1) Jamil S/o Jahur Shah, (2) Siddiq S/o Mohamood Meo, (3) Netram S/o Shri Basanti Lal, (4) Rajendra S/o Sampat Ram, (5) Avinash alias Billu S/o Shri Bonre Lal, (5) Ramzan S/o Safeda Meo, and (7) Kallu S/o Safeda Meo, are directed against the common Judgment and order dated 12.2002, passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Behror, District Alwar, in Sessions Case No. 22 of 2002 (26 of 2001), therefore, these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common Judgment .

2. The trial Court has convicted and sentenced the accused-appellants as under : Accused-Appellants Under Sections Sentence of Imprisonment Jamil, Ramzan, Kallu and Siddiq

395, IPC Each accused to undergo 10 years RI and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-; in default of payment of fine, each of them to further undergo three months additional simple imprisonment. 397, IPCEach accused to undergo 10 years RI and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-; in default of payment of fine, eac of them to further undergo three months additional simple imprisonment.

458, IPCEach accused to undergo 7 years RI and a fine of Rs




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top