Ashok Parihar, J.-Since, on similar set of facts same reliefs have been claimed by the petitioners, the above writ petitions have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.

2. While challenging about 29 orders of promotion issued in October, 1991, giving promotion to various persons on different posts on the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC), the petitioners have also made following prayers which are reproduced hereasunder:-

“B) By an appropriate writ order or direction the quota and cyclic order as prescribed in Schedule for promotion to the post of Executive Officer II, Executive Officer III, and Revenue Officer I, may be set aside and quashed and it may be directed that the quota for promotion to the post of Executive Officer III should only be made from Executive Officer IV and promotion to the post of Revenue Officer I, should be made from Revenue Officer II, only or in the alternative promotions from the post of Executive Officer IV and Revenue Officer II should be made in equal proportion. C) By an appropriate writ order or direction, the Respondents No.1 & 2 be directed to re-convene the Departmental Promotion Committ