SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 2171

PRAKASH TATIA
Tara Devi – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Dilip Kawadia for the Appellant.
Mr. Chaitanya Gehlot, for the Respondent.

Judgment

Prakash Tatia, J.-This appeal is against the Judgment and decree dated 04.01.2000 passed by the learned District Judge, Rajsamand in Divorce Case No.69/96 filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act by the respondent.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage of the plaintiff respondent with appellant-defendant took place in the year 1987. According to the plaintiff , the defendant lived with the plaintiff till the year 1988 for one year only. According to the plaintiff , the defendants attitude towards plaintiff and his family members became very inimical and hence she used to quarrel with the plaintiff and his family members. In the year 1988, the defendant-appellant gave threat that she will take poison or will burn herself and implicate the plaintiff and his family members. She tried to burn herself 2-3 times but she was saved by the plaintiff and his family members. It is alleged that since the year 1988, after the said dispute, the defendant left the plaintiff and is living at her parental house. The plaintiff sought decree for divorce on the ground of desertion as well as on the ground of cruelty by filing the divorce petition on 110.1996.

3. The appella
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top