SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 2411

R.P.VYAS
Ramswaroop – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.D. Goswami, for the Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Vyas, Government Advocate.

Judgment

N.N. Mathur, J.-By way of instant habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner Ramswaroop seeks production of his sister namely Sunita @ Santosh. It appears that the detenue Sunita @ Santosh is a victim of rape. She lodged a First Information Report at Police Station, Hanumangarh alleging therein that while she was serving as Office Assistant in the Department of DPEP, Hanumangarh, she was being sexually exploited by the Head of the Office namely Onkar Singh R.A.S. and his associates namely Dhanne Singh, Bachhu Singh, Gurudev Singh, Shiv Narain and Milkha Singh. The police registered a case being FIR No. 239/2006 at Police Station, Hanumangarh for offence under Section 376(2)(b) IPC. Her statement under Section 164 CrPC was recorded on 28.04.2006 by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hanumangarh. After usual investigation a charge-sheet has been filed against the said accused persons for offence under Section 376(2)(b) IPC.

2. An another FIR came to be filed on 15.08.2006 by the petitioner herein Ramswaroop stating inter alia that on 13.08.2006 Dharamvir, mother of Praveen and Babli W/o Dharamvir visited their house and pressurized th






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top