H.R. Panwar, J.-By the instant revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the Code hereinafter), the petitioner has challenged the order dated 12.01.2006 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur (for short the trial Court hereinafter) in Sessions Case No. 122/2005, whereby the trial Court framed the charge against the petitioner for the offence under Section 202, IPC, however, refused to frame charge for the offence under Section 212, IPC on the ground that there is absolutely no evidence that the petitioner harboured or concealed any person to whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the offender. Aggrieved by the order impugned framing charge for the offence under Section 202, IPC, the petitioner has filed the instant revision petition.

2. I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned as also challan papers.

3. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the trial Court has specifically concluded in the order impugned that there is absolutely no evidence to show that the petitioner harboured or concea