SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 173

R.S.CHAUHAN
Sunda Ram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajesh Goswami, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Arun Sharma, Public Prosecutor. Conclusion :

Judgment

R.S. Chauhan, J.-The petitioners have challenged the order dated 210.2005 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Thana Gazi, Alwar, whereby he has framed the charges for the offences under Sections 148, 323, 341, 325, 326, 504 read with Section 149, IPC. The petitioners have also challenged the order dated 012.2005 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 1 Alwar whereby he has confirmed the charge order dated 210.2005.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 11.2004 one Shri Suresh Chand filed a report at Police Station Narainpur, Alwar, wherein he claimed that the accused petitioners came with deadly weapon and assaulted his mother, his close relative and him whereby they sustained injuries. On the basis of the said report, a former FIR was registered for offences under Sections 143, 341, 323, 504, IPC. The injured, specially, Smt. Somvati, who is said to have sustained a grievous injury, was initially medically examined on 11.2004. Accordingly to the Injury Report, she had received four injuries by a blunt weapon. Subsequently, on 011.2004 she was re-examined by a Medical Board. However, the Medical Board did not give any opinion about the nature of weapo















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top