SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 2539

N.K.JAIN
Kura adopted S/o Kalyan – Appellant
Versus
Ramkishan S/o Kalyan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.K. Agarwal with Mr. Alok Chaturvedi, Counsel for Defendant-Appellant.
Mr. J.P. Goyal, Counsel for Plaintiff-Respondents.

Judgment

Narendra Kumar Jain, J.-This is defendant’s second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, ‘Civil Procedure Code’) directed against the Judgment and decree dated 23.07.1988 passed by the District Judge, Tonk, in Civil Regular Appeal No. 2/84 (74/86), whereby he dismissed the appeal of the defendant and affirmed the Judgment and decree dated 212.1983 passed by the Munsiff and Judicial Magistrate, Malpura, in Civil Suit No. 89/74, whereby the suit of the plaintiff-respondents for declaration and permanent injunction, was decreed.

2. This Court, while admitting the Second Appeal on 22.09.1988, formulated the following substantial questions of law:-

“1. Whether on the basis of averments contained in the plaint the civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit filed by plaintiffs and the said suit was not triable by Revenue Courts?

2. Whether the trial Court committed illegality and material irregularity in not taking on record the two documents which were writings in Bahis for Samvat Year 2017 and 2030 in the nature of admission of the plaintiff and when the said documents were produced at the very initial stage and for the purposes of cross-exa













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top