SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 200

H.R.PANWAR
Mangi Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. A.K. Acharya, for the Appellant-Applicants.
Mr. J.P.S. Chaudhary, Public Prosecutor.

Judgment

H.R. Panwar, J.-By the instant application under Section 389, CrPC, applicant-appellants seek suspension of conviction imposed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 3, Udaipur (for short, "the trial Court" hereinafter) against the applicant-appellants vide the Judgment and order dated 29.05.2002 passed in Sessions Case No. 16/2001, (56/2001), whereby they have been convicted for the offences under Sections 148, 324/149 and 326/149, IPC, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 500/-and in default of payment of fine further to undergo three months simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 148, IPC; one years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-and in default of payment of fine further to undergo three months simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 324/149, IPC; and four years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/-and in default of payment of fine further to undergo one years simple imprisonment.

2. I have heard learned Counsel for the applicant-appellants and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the Judgment and order impugned.

3. It has been contended by the learned Counsel for the appellant-
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top