H.R.PANWAR
Mangi Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
H.R. Panwar, J.-By the instant application under Section 389, CrPC, applicant-appellants seek suspension of conviction imposed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 3, Udaipur (for short, "the trial Court" hereinafter) against the applicant-appellants vide the Judgment and order dated 29.05.2002 passed in Sessions Case No. 16/2001, (56/2001), whereby they have been convicted for the offences under Sections 148, 324/149 and 326/149, IPC, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 500/-and in default of payment of fine further to undergo three months simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 148, IPC; one years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-and in default of payment of fine further to undergo three months simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 324/149, IPC; and four years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/-and in default of payment of fine further to undergo one years simple imprisonment.
2. I have heard learned Counsel for the applicant-appellants and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the Judgment and order impugned.
3. It has been contended by the learned Counsel for the appellant-
Deputy Director of Collegiate Education (Admn.) vs. S. Nagoor Meera
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.