SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 26

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Tola – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. B.D. Mittal, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Rameshwar Dave, for the Respondents.

Judgment

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.-The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India on 010.2002 against the respondents with a prayer that by an appropriate writ, order or direction the Judgment and award dated 19.02.2002 (Annexure 5) passed by the learned Judge, Labour Court, Udaipur (respondent No. 3) be modified to the extent that the petitioner be granted the relief of reinstatement in place of amount of compensation of Rs. 35,000/-as awarded by the learned Judge, Labour Court, Udaipur (respondent No. 3) to the petitioner.

2. It arises in the following circumstances :

(i) That the petitioner was initially appointed as Beldar with effect from 010.1082 and she continued in the service upto 15.05.1987.

(ii) That the services of the petitioner were retrenched w.e.f. 15.05.1987.

(iii) That further case of the petitioner is that the petitioner raised an industrial dispute and the appropriate Government made a reference of the dispute to the respondent No. 3 vide notification dated 24.05.1994 to the effect whether termination of services of petitioner Smt. Tola by Executive Engineer, Left Main Canal through Executive Engineer-I, was vali
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top