H.R. Panwar, J.-By the instant criminal revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, "the Code"), the petitioner-complainant has challenged the order dated 12.03.2004 passed by the Sessions Judge, Hanumangarh (for short, "the Revisional Court") in Criminal Revision Petition No. 65/2003, whereby the revisional Court set-aside the order dated 22.03.2003 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hanumangarh (for short, "the trial Court") whereby the trial Court took cognizance of the offences under Sections 307, 326, 325, 324 and 323/34, IPC against respondent No. 2 Smt. Kaushalya apart from taking cognizance of the offences against co-accused Prithvi Ram, Aati Ram alias Atma Ram, Sahab Ram and Sudesh Kumar. Aggrieved by the order of the revisional Court, the petitioner-complainant has filed the instant revision petition.

2. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the order impugned passed by revisional Court as well as the order dated 22.03.2003 passed by the trial Court taking cognizance of the offences against the respondent No. 2.

3. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that on the strength o