SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 540

K.S.RATHORE
Sanwta – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. K.K. Mehrishi, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Bajrang Lal Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Sharma, for the Respondents.

Judgment

K.S. Rathore, J.-Plaintiff respondents No. 3 to 6 filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant petitioners in the Court of Sub Divisional Officer-I Jaipur. In the suit for declaration the averment made on behalf of the respondents is that one Mahadev son of Jagan Nath was the sole Khatedar tenant of the lands comprised in Khasra Nos. 120, 121 122, 125, 126, 127, 129 155 and 156 in all measuring 40 bigha 7 biswa and he was the khatedar tenant of 1/4th share in the lands comprised in khasra No. 128, 130, and 131 measuring 2 bihgas.

2. The controversy arose between the parties when the alleged will executed by Mahadev regarding his property on 26.08.1969 in favour of Narain son of Fatta to deprive his adopted son Bheru of his property. Mahadev died on 10.01.1975.

3. In this present writ petition the main challenge is to the Judgment passed by the SDO Dated 30.08.2000 (Annexure-3) and the Board of Revenue dated 29.06.2001 (Annexure-6). The SDO, Jaipur has rejected the application filed on behalf of the petitioner by which the petitioner asked to examine the document in question by the Finger Print Expert whether thumb impression of the executor i











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top