SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 395

H.R.PANWAR
Hira Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sandeep Mehta, for the Petitioner. Mr. J.P.S. Chaudhary, Public Prosecutor.

Judgment

H.R. Panwar, J.-By the instant criminal second bail application under Section 439 read with Section 167(2), CrPC, petitioner Hira Lal seeks bail on the ground that for a period of 60 days from the date of his production before the Magistrate , the police failed to file the challan and, therefore, the applicant filed an application seeking bail on the ground that the Magistrate is not competent to authorise detention of the petitioner after 60 days from the date he was initially produced before the Magistrate. The bail application filed by the applicant came to be rejected by the learned Sessions Judge vide order dated 012.2004 holding therein that the period for filing the challan is 90 days and not 60 days.

2. I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Carefully gone through the order impugned and the police investigating diary (case diary).

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was found in possession of 47.200 kgs of poppy-straw without licence or permit, which is an offence punishable under Section 8/15-B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, "the NDPS Act:). In relation to po





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top