DINESH MAHESHWARI
Udai Singh – Appellant
Versus
Govind Singh – Respondent
Dinesh Maheshwari, J.-The instant second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) against the Judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Rajsamand dated 28.04.1983 in Civil First Appeal No. 30/82 affirming the Judgment and decree passed by the Munsif , Bheem in Civil Original Suit No. 6/81 was admitted by this Court on 13.09.1983 with the following order :-"13.09.1983 Honble Mr.M.C. Jain, J. Mr. V.D. Calla for the appellant. Learned Counsel for the appellant has cited a Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court. Triveni Prasad Singh vs., Ramasray Choudhary, AIR 1931 Patna P. 241. In view of the above authority it appears that the following substantial question of law arises in this appeal. "Whether the present suit for possession is not barred by Section 47 of CPC." The appeal is admitted on the above question."
2. The short question, therefore, in this appeal is to consider maintainability of the suit filed by the appellant with reference to Section 47 CPC.
Brief facts relevant for the purpose of determination of this question are that the plaintiff Prem Singh (since deceased and represented by the appellants) filed a suit in the Court of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.