SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 646

H.R.PANWAR
Chand Ram – Appellant
Versus
Chand Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. G.R. Punia, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor.

Judgment

H.R. Panwar, J.-By the instant criminal revision petition under Sec. 397 read with Sec. 401, CrPC, the accused-petitioner has challenged the impugned Judgment dated 19.2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Barmer (for short, "the appellate Court" hereinafter) in Criminal Appeal No. 15 of 2003, by which the appeal filed by the accused-petitioner against the Judgment and order dated 19.2003, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barmer in Criminal Case No. 353 of 2001 has been dismissed.

2. The facts of the case, relevant and necessary for disposal of this criminal revision petition, in a nut shell, are that on 24.2001 complainant Doda Khan lodged an FIR with Police Station, Ramsar stating therein that on 20.4.2001, at about 6:00 a.m., PW. 3 Bilal Khan came to his house and informed that in the night, at about 1:00 a.m., he and Kamruddin alighted from the truck at the bus stand of village Gagariya and were going to their house and saw accused-petitioner coming out from the broken part of the cabin of the complainant. On this information, the complainant went to his cabin and found the cabin broken. On searching the chest, it was found that the currency














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top