SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 284

H.R.PANWAR
Girdhari Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. M.K. Garg, the Petitioner. Mr. B.S. Sandhu, for Respondent No. 2 Mr. O.P. Rathi, Public Prosecutor.

Judgment

H.R. Panwar, J.-By this criminal revision petition under Secs. 397/401 CrPC, the petitioner complainant has challenged the order dated 29.2004 passed by Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar (for short the revisional Court hereinafter ) in a criminal revision No. 170/2004 filed by respondent No. 2 Sarwan Kumar against the order dated 9.7.2004 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sri Ganganagar (for short the trial Court hereinafter) in criminal case No. 106/2004, whereby the trial Court dismissed the application filed by respondent No. 2 under Sec. 311 CrPC, the revisional Court set aside the order of the trial Court and allowed the revision petition and directed the petitioner-complaint to appear before the trial Court for further cross-examination as also permitted respondent No. 2 to summon the account books of the firm Nanu Ram Girdhari Lal. Aggrieved by the order of revisional Court, the petitioner-complainant has filed the instant criminal revisional petition.

2. Briefly stated facts, relevant and necessary for disposal of the instant revisional petition are that a complaint was filed by the petitioner-complainant against respondent No. 2 under Sec. 138







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top