SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 1265

PRAKASH TATIA
Poosa Ram – Appellant
Versus
Madan Gopal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.R. Nagori, for the Appellant.
Mr. S.C. Maloo, for the Respondent-Caveator.

Judgment

Prakash Tatia, J.-Brief facts of the case are that the appellant-tenant took a premises on rent from respondent-land-lord plaintiff for which a rent deed was executed on 19.02.1978.

2. Adjoining shop to the shop in dispute was in possession of the another tenant of plaintiff who was Jasraj. After the death of Jasraj, his widow Akhi Bai was facing a suit for eviction filed by the plaintiff and that suit was decreed by the trial Court on 110.1987 against which an appeals was preferred by the tenant of that shop, which was dismissed by the High Court on 11.01.1988. The High Court granted one years time to the widow of Jasraj to vacate the premises on her furnishing undertaking for the delivery of possession to the landlord in terms of the order of the trial Court dated 11.01.1988. But during this period of one year, Akhi Bai expired on 14.05.1988 upon which escheated proceedings were started on the application of Tehsildar, Jodhpur and that said adjoining shop No. 2 was taken in possession of the State Government. In the escheated proceedings, ultimately, the respondent-plaintiff could obtain the possession of the shop on 27.02.1991 after end of the escheated litigation.

3. A







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top