SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 1228

GOVIND MATHUR
Kishna Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. J.L. Purohit, for the Petitioner. Mr. Shyam Ladrecha, Additional Government Advocate.

Judgment

Govind Mathur, J.-A suit in the Court of Additional Collector, Kolayat was filed by the petitioner for partitioning and giving separate possession of 60 bighas of land out of ancestral land standing in favour of Shri Ramkaran, elder brother of the petitioner. Shri Ramkaran in the written statement accepted the

tenancy as ancestral property and also agreed for grant of decree for separate possession of 60 bighas of land. Accordingly by Judgment dated 23.01.1989 the suit was decreed and the petitioner was granted Gair Khatedari rights with regard to land of his share.

2. The Deputy Commissioner for Colonisation by an order dated 01.09.1993 made a reference to the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer with regard to Gair Khatedari rights granted to the petitioner on the count that the Assistant Commissioner, Kolayat while granting Gair Khatedari rights to the petitioner by Judgment dated 23.01.1989 acted in contravention of the provisions of Section 15-A of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") which provides that Gair Khatedari rights can be granted only to those persons who had been recorded as in possession of the land prior to samvat 2012 and

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top