B. Prasad, J.-This appeal is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the learned Single Judge has upheld the order of the Tribunal, dismissing the claim of the workman.

2. The appellant workman was employed as a casual, part time worker with the respondent-department. According to the workman, he worked from 01.08.1984 to 01.07.1988 regularly as a part time worker and during this period he had worked for such a period which qualified him to be a workman who could not be retrenched without the compliance of Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act. According to the workman, by verbal orders, on 01.07.1988 his services were retrenched. Raising a dispute, the workman went to the Labour Court. The Labour Court, after examining the case of the petitioner, came to the conclusion that the services of the petitioner were a fixed term service, which were regulated by intervals. The last appointment of the petitioner was for 02.04.1988 to 30.06.1988. Thereafter, the term of the appointment were not extended. Since, the appointment was not extended beyond 30th June, 1988 his retrenchment was not found to be hit by Section 2 (oo) (bb) of the Indust