SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 1764

SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK
Balu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.K. Charan, for Accused-Appellant.
Mr. O.P. Rathi, Public Prosecutor.

Judgment

S.P. Pathak, J.-This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC is filed against the Judgment and order dated 18.06.2003 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge No.2, Chittorgarh in Sessions Case No.31/2002- State vs. Balu & Ors., whereby the accused-appellant has been convicted under Section 304 Part-II IPC and sentenced to 7 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.500/-, in default thereof to further suffer one months simple imprisonment.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present case are that on 30.03.2002 complainant Ladu (PW. 2) present at Parsoli Hospital gave oral information to the SHO, Police Station Parosoli to the effect that in the evening at 7 PM when he came at his house, he found Badri, Gokal, Balu, Kana, Bhagwana, Bhona alias Mukesh and Smt. Dali sitting in front of his house under a tree abusing his family members, who on his brother Kalus asking not to do so, connived with each other and in order to kill him entered in the house unauthorizedly and started beating him by fists and kicks. On his intervention, Kana threw a stone on him also. Balu twisted the neck of his brother and on his crying when uncle Janu came running, Bhagwana threw a stone o





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top