SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 619

GOVIND MATHUR
Rajasthan Steels – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Steels – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Pradeep Shah, for the Petitioner.

Judgment

Govind Mathur, J.-By this petition for writ under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a challenge

is given to the order dated 18.01.2005 passed by learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No. 2,

Bhilwara on an application preferred by the plaintiff under Order VII Rule 14, CPC

2. The application under Order VII Rule 14, CPC was filed by the plaintiff petitioner on 012.2004 in a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.11,VII,6,500/-(sic). By the said application leave was sought to take 22 documents relating to correspondence between the defendant and Kamdhenu Ispat Ltd. The documents were said to be in power and possession of the representative of Kamdhenu Ispat Ltd. at the time of presenting the plaintiffs. Thus, leave was sought to take the same on record being related to the subject matter of the suit. The plaintiff also stated in the application that the documents sought to be taken on record by seeking leave by the Court under Order VII Rule 14, CPC were already filed before the Court while recording statements of one of the partners of the plaintiff firm.

3. The trial Court while adjudicating the application found that the documents, with regard to which leave wa










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top