SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 2089

AJAY RASTOGI, S.K.KESHOTE
Om Prakash Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Lali – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri Saransh Saini, for the Appellant wife
Shri B.L. Agarwal, for the Respondent husband.

Judgment

S.K. Keshote, J.-On 15.07.2005, both the parties were present but despite of making all efforts they did not arrive at any compromise to live together, hence the arguments were heard and concluded and the matter was ordered to place on the Board on 21.07.2005 for dictation of order. On 21.07.2005, the Bench was not formed. The matter was placed on the Board on 05.08.2005. The appellant wife was present but the respondent husband remained absent. It is submitted that the respondent husband has settled the matter outside the Court with the appellant wife. They have signed a joint application under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of their marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent.

2. The respondent husband filed the divorce petition against the appellant wife in the Family Court No. 2, Jaipur City, Jaipur being Matrimonial Case No. 96/1998. The learned Family Court allowed that petition vide its Judgment and decree, dated 23.08.1999 and the appellant wife has filed this appeal against the said Judgment and decree. The learned Family Court granted the decree in favour of the husband of divorce on the ground of desertion and cruelty.

3. The













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top