H.R.PANWAR
Babulal – Appellant
Versus
Aanpurna Sarees – Respondent
H.R. Panwar, J.-This criminal revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the Code hereinafter) is directed against the order dated 20.01.2004 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balotra (for short the trial Court hereinafter) in Criminal Case 588/2002 whereby on an application filed by accused-non-petitioners, the trial Court dismissed the complaint filed by petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short the Act hereinafter), even after taking cognizance of offence, discharged the accused-non-petitioners. Aggrieved by the order impugned, the petitioner-complainant filed the instant revision petition.
2. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the order impugned and the record of the trial Court.
3. The facts giving rise to the instant revision petition are that the petitioner filed a complaint against non-petitioners under Section 138 of the Act on 09.05.2002. The trial Court recorded the statement of complainant, and after perusal of statement and the documents filed by the complainant, came to the conclusion that prima facie offence under Section 138 of the Act is m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.