SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 973

H.R.PANWAR
Abdul Rahim – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, for the Petitioner.
Mr. S.N. Tiwari, Public Prosecutor, for the State.

Judgment

H.R. Panwar,J.-This criminal revision petition under Section 397 of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the Code hereinafter) is directed against the Judgment and order dated 18.02.2005 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Pali, Camp Jaitaran (for short the appellate Court) in Criminal Appeal No. 29/2005 whereby the appellate Court dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner against the Judgment and order dated 14.07.2000 passed by judical Magistrate, Jaitaran (for short the trial Court) in Criminal Case No. 763/96 (223/95) whereby the trial Court convicted the accused-petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 338 and 304-A, I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo six months simple imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine, further to undergo 15 days simple imprisonment for the offences under Sections 279 and 337. He was also sentenced to undergo one years simple imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default of payment of fine further to undergo one months simple imprisonment to the offence punishable under Section 338, IPC and to undergo two years simple imprisonment and fine of Rs. 3,000/











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top