SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 761

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Amina Begumq – Appellant
Versus
Ramzan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.L. Purohit, for the Appellant
M.A. Siddiqui, for the Respondents

Judgment

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.-This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner - plaintiff against the order dtd. 6.5.2004 passed by the learned Additional Dist. Judge (Fast Track), Parbatsar, Dist. Nagaur by which application dtd. 29.2003 by which a prayer was made by the plaintiff-petitioner for withdrawing the suit on the basis of compromise dtd. 29.2003 was rejected.

It arises in the following circumstances:

i) That the plaintiff petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents-defendants on 6.1998 with a prayer that they be restrained from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff-petitioner over the property mentioned in para 1 of the plaint.

ii) That the suit was contested by the defendant-respondents by filing written statement and on the basis of pleadings of the parties, issues were also framed.

iii) That the case of the Plaintiff petitioner is that during pendency of the suit, the defendants-respondents executed an agreement for sale of property in dispute on 12.2002 in favour of Sahabuddin and the respondents-defendants further executed a power of attorney dtd. 12.2002 in favour of Sahabuddin in whose favour the agreement dtd. 12.20
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top