SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 165

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, F.C.BANSAL
National Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Hurma Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rakesh Bhargava, Advocate for the Appellant

Judgment

Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.-Petitioner-National Insurance Company in the instant petition seeks to review the order dated May 8, 2000 passed in DB Civil Special Appeal No. 26/2000, whereby the Special Appeal filed by the petitioner was ordered to be dismissed summarily at the admission stage.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel that the learned Single Judge while deciding writ petition, did not consider the application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC which was already on record.

3. Having heard the submissions and scanned the relevant provisions we find that Claims Tribunal has all the powers of the Civil Court and mandatory provisions in this regard envisaged under Rule 10.27 of the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Rules 1990, which demarcate limited powers of Claims Tribunal as a Civil Court. Rule 10.27 reads thus:

“10.27. Power vested in Civil Court which may be exercised by Claims Tribunal.

.(1) Without prejudice to the provisions of Section 169,-

.(a) every claims tribunal, may exercise all or any of the powers vested in a Civil Court under the following

provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in so far as they may be applicable, namely: Section 30, 32, 34, 35(a), 75(a) &





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top