Sunil Kurnar Garg, J.-This revision petition has been filed by the husband-pelitioner against the judgment dated 16.2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Chittorgarh in Criminal Revision No. 22/98 by which the learned Sessions Judge enhanced the maintenance of the respondent-wife to Rs. 400/-per month in place of Rs. 250 and maintenance of her children to Rs. 250/-each per month in place of Rs. 150/-each per month awarded by additional Chief Judicial, Kapasan by order dated 13.98.

2. The facts giving rise to this revision petition are as follows:

(i) The non-petitioner Smt. Shanta Bai who is wife of petitioner-husband filed an application under Section 125 CrPC before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapasan on 22.96 inter alia stating that their marriage took place on 3 0.6.90 and because of that marriage, two daughters were born and for maintenance of herself and for her children, she claimed maintenance.

3. The petitioner-husband filed a reply and after recording the evidence, the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate through his order dated 13.98 accepted the application of respondent-wife and awarded maintenance to the tune