H.R. Panwar, J.-These six appeals raise common questions of law and facts, parties to which are common and, therefore, for convenience, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. For convenience, facts of S.B. Civil Misc. Appeals No. 411/2001 and 898/2001 arc taken as leading case.

2. Three separate suits for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction were filed by plain tiff-appellants namely Rama vs. Bhawani Singh & Ors.. Civil Original Suit No. 8/2001; Rama & Ors. vs. Bhawani Singh & Ors., Civil Original Suit No. 9/2001; and Ganga & Ors. vs. Bhawani Singh & Ors. Civil Original Suit No. 10/2001. For convenience appellants Rama & Ors. and Ganga & Ors. shall be referred hereinafter as ‘the palintiffs’ and Bhawani Singh & Ors. shall be referred as ‘the defendants’. Along with the suits, plaintiffs filed three separate applications under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 read with 151, CrPC against the defendants seeking temporary injunction during the pendency of the suit.

3. Facts of the case as set up by the plaintiffs are that agricultural lands description whereof is given in the plaint, was agreed to be sold to the plaintiffs by defe