SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 610

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L. Kala, for the Appellant
G.R. Goyal, for the Respondents

Judgment

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.-This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner on 26.5.1992 against the respondents with the prayer that by an appropriate writ, direction or order, it may be declared that the petitioner is entitled for family pension and the State Government is under an obligation to accept the revised option of the petitioner etc. etc.

2. It arises in the following circumstances: The husband of the petitioner retired on 17.1974 after attaining the age of superannuation. The husband of the petitioner expired on 30.7.1974. Her husband of the petitioner expired on 30.7.1974. Her husband was working as Chowkidar in the Irrigation Department, Government of Rajasthan in the office of Assistant Engineer, Irrigation Sub Division, Pindwara and at the time or retirement, he was posted at Saie Pariyozna Sub Division No. 3. The petitioner is the widow of late/Shankerla), Chowkidar and is entitled to get pension which is being denied to her and therefore, this writ petition is preferred. It was submitted in the writ petition that the petitioner made various representations to all concerned officers of the Stale Government with











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top