SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 356

GYAN SUDHA MISRA
Amba Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ikramuddin – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.U. Qazi, for the Appellant
N.S. Rathore, R.D. Rastogi and Gurmeet Kaur, for the Respondents

Judgment

Gyan Sudha Misra, J.-The claimants-appellants herein are the parents of the deceased-Shankar Lal was died as a result of the accident caused by the motor vehicle which was insured with respondent No. 3-United India Assurance Company Ltd. and consequently an award ot Rs. 1,26,000/-(Rs. One lac twenty six thousand) has been passed in favour of the claimants-appellants towards compensation. The claimants have come up with the case that they are a family of labourers and thence the deceased although was aged only 15 years, he was earning not less than Rs. 80 to 90 per day as the was carrying excavated soil on a mule and thus he was earning no less than Rs. 2400/-(Rs. two thousand four hundred) per months. Higher amount of compensation therefore should have been awarded for the deceased who inspite of his tender age had earning capacity of Rs. 2400/-per month.

2. Learned Counsel for the respondent No. 3 United India Assurance Company Ltd. however submitted that since the deceased was only 15 years old, he was not capable of earning any amount and hence the award of Rs. 1,26,000- (Rs. one lac twenty six thousand) which has been passed in favour of the deceased, should be treated



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top