SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 712

High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : Sunil Kumar Garg
Arjun Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 126 of 1999
Decided On : 07/10/2001

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Shambhoo Rathore and Mr. D.S. Udawat, for the Appellant
Mr. Ramesh Purohit, Public Prosecutor for the Respondents

The credibility of the prosecutrix's statement is crucial in cases of alleged kidnapping and rape.

Headnote:

Rape - Kidnapping - IPC 376, IPC 366, IPC 363 - The court acquitted accused-appellants Anna Kunwar and Prem Kunwar of the charge for the offence under Section 376/114, I.P.C. and also acquitted accused-appellant Arjun Singh of the charges for the offence under Sections 366 and 363, I.P.C. and also acquitted accused-appellants Kishan Singh and Onkar Singh of the charge for the offence under Section 363, I.P.C., but convicted the present accused-appellants Kishan Singh and Onkar Singh of the charge for the offence under Section 366, I.P.C. and Arjun Singh of the charge for the offence under Section 376, I.P.C.

Fact of the Case:

The prosecutrix was allegedly kidnapped and forced to marry accused-appellant Arjun Singh. The court found discrepancies in the prosecutrix's statement and acquitted some accused-appellants while convicting others.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecutrix's statement did not support the charges of kidnapping and rape against the accused-appellants.

Issues: The main issue was the credibility of the prosecutrix's statement and the alleged offences of kidnapping and rape.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the prosecutrix's statement and found that there was no evidence to support the charges of kidnapping and rape against the accused-appellants.

Final Decision: The court acquitted some accused-appellants and set aside the convictions of others based on the lack of evidence supporting the charges.

Judgment

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.-This appeal has been filed by the accused-appellants against the Judgment and order dated 26-2-1999 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Udaipur in Sessions Case No. 13/99 by which he acquitted the accused Anna Kunwar and Prem Kunwar of the charge for the offence under Section 376/114,

I.P.C. and alsoacquitted accused-appellant Arjun Singh of the charges for the offence under Sections 366 and 363, I.P.C. and also acquitted accused-appellants Kishan Singh and Onkar Singh of the charge for the offence under Section 363, I.P.C., but convicted the present accused-appellants Kishan Singh and Onkar Singh of the charge for the offence under Section 366, I.P.C. and Arjun Singh of the charge for the offence under Section 376, I.P.C. and sentenced them in the following manner:--Name of accused- appellantsConvicted under section Sectence awarded

1. Kishan Singh 2. Onkar Singh 3. Arjun Singh Five years RI and to pay fine of Rs , /-1,000 . in

366, IPC 376, IPC default of payment of fine, of further undergo six months RI Ten years RI and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo one year RI.

2. It arises in the following circumstances: -Name of accused- appellants Convicted under Sentence awarded section On 31-10-1998 at about 5.30 p.m., P.W. 3, Santosh Kunwar w/o Amar Singh (P.W. 4) lodged a written report Ex. P/2 in the Police Station Goverdhan vilas District Udaipur stating inter alia that P.W. 1 Manju Kunwar (hereinafter referred to as the prosecutrix) is her sister and she came to her village Matun on 20-10-1998. It was further stated in the report that on 29-10-1998 at about 7.00 p.m., accused-appellant Kishan Singh came to her house and told her that her mother Bhanwar Kunwar, who was residing at Bheem, was not feeling well and her mother had called pro secutrix P.W. 1 Manju Kunwar. It was further stated in the report that accused-appellant Kishan Singh further told that her Tau accused-appellant Onkar Singh) would also go to

Bheem by vehicle at 8.00 p.m. and placing reliance on accused-appellant Kishan Singh, P.W. 3 Santosh Kunwar sent prosecutrix P.W. 1 Manju Kunwar with him and at the time when prosecutrix P.W. 1 Manju Kunwar was sent with accused-appellant Kishan Singh, her mother-in-law Gulab Kunwar and Jethani kailash Kunwar were also there. It was further stated in the report that she had come to know that both accused appellants Kishan Singh and Onkar Singh did not take prosecutrix P.W. 1 Manju Kunwar to Bheem, but they took her to village Tanna Bhagal, where prosecutrix P.W. 1 Manju Kunwar was compelled to marry with accused-appellant Arjun Singh and at that time, prosecutrix P.W. 1 Manju Kunwar was only 13 years of age and thus, she was minor. It was further stated in the report that prosecutrix P.W. 1 Manju Kunwar was compelled to marry with accused-appellant Arjun Singh against her will. On this report, police registered the ease and chalked out regular FIR Ex. P/3 and started investigation. During investigation, prosecutrix P.W, 1 Manju Kunwar was got medically examined by P.W. 2 Dr. G.L. Dad and her medical examination report is Ex. P/i. The accused-appellants Onkar Singh and Arjun Singh were arrested on 15-11-1998 through arrest memos Ex. P/7 and Ex. P/8 respectively and accused-appellant Kishan Singh was arrested on 15-12-1998 through arrest memo Ex, P/9. After usual investigation, police submitted challan against the present accused-appellants and two more accused, namely, Anna Kunwar and Prem Kunwar in the Court of Magistrate, from where the case was committed to the Court of Session. On 22-1-1999, the learned Sessions Judge, Udaipur framed charges for the offence under Sections 363, 366 and 376, I.PC. against the accused-appellant Arjun Singh; for the offence under Sections 363 and 366, I.P.C. against the accused-appellants Onkar Singh and Kishan Singh; and for the offence under Section 376/114,

.I.P.C. against accused Prem Kunwar and Anna Kunwar. T




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top