SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 742

S.K.KESHOTE
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bharat Vyas, for the Appellant
G.S. Bafna, for the Respondents

Judgment

S.K. Keshote, J.-These four petitions are not only identical but the parties are also commonnd therein the identical point of law for consideration of this Court has been raised. These matters in fact and substance are identical as these four writ petition are against assessments of sales tax made for four different assessment years. Hence, these four petitions are taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. For the disposal of these matters, the facts and the grounds raised to challenge the assessment orders of the sales tax passed by respondent No. 3 are taken from the writ petition No.2020/2001.

3. Thepetitioners to carry out enormous construction works in connection with the developmental works carried out by the Ministry of Defence throughout the State of Rajasthan, they have to undertake the construction work of buildings for housing, offices and the residential accommodations of their officers and staff besides other defence work. In order to get these works done, the petitioners award contracts to various contractors and also supply to them building materials such as cement and steel. The petitioners purchase cement and steel fr












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top